The background and legacy of Lewontin's apportionment of human genetic diversity

Lewontin's 1972 article 'The apportionment of human diversity' described a key feature of human genetic diversity that would have profound impacts on conversations regarding genetics and race: the typical genetic locus varies much less between classical human race groupings than one might infer from inspecting the features historically used to define those races, like skin pigmentation. From this, Lewontin concluded: 'Human racial classification horizontal ellipsis is now seen to be of virtually no genetic or taxonomic significance' (p. 397). Here, 50 years after the paper's publication, the goal is to understand the origins and legacy of the paper. Aided by insights from published papers and interviews with several of Lewontin's contemporaries, I review the 1972 paper, asking about the intellectual background that led to the publication of the paper, the development of its impact, the critiques of the work and the work's application and limitations today. The hope is that by gaining a clearer understanding of the origin and reasoning of the paper, we might dispel various confusions about the result and sharpen an understanding of the enduring value and insight the result provides.This article is part of the theme issue 'Celebrating 50 years since Lewontin's apportionment of human diversity'.

Automated summary

This article reviews the origins, impact, and applications of Lewontin's 1972 paper, examining its influence on genetics and race research. The goal is to clarify any confusion surrounding the paper's results and gain a deeper understanding of its enduring value and insight.