4.2 Review

Pharmacogenetic interventions to improve outcomes in patients with multimorbidity or prescribed polypharmacy: a systematic review

期刊

PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 89-99

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41397-021-00260-6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional medicines optimisation interventions in people with multimorbidity and polypharmacy are limited, and a more holistic and integrated approach is needed. Pharmacogenetics has the potential to improve medicines optimisation. Current studies suggest that pharmacist-led medicines optimisation, including pharmacogenetics, could have significant benefits for patients and health systems. However, further studies are needed to establish the generalizability of these findings in real-world patient populations.
Conventional medicines optimisation interventions in people with multimorbidity and polypharmacy are complex and yet limited; a more holistic and integrated approach to healthcare delivery is required. Pharmacogenetics has potential as a component of medicines optimisation. Studies involving multi-medicine pharmacogenetics in adults with multimorbidity or polypharmacy, reporting on outcomes derived from relevant core outcome sets, were included in this systematic review. Narrative synthesis was undertaken to summarise the data; meta-analysis was inappropriate due to study heterogeneity. Fifteen studies of diverse design and variable quality were included. A small, randomised study involving pharmacist-led medicines optimisation, including pharmacogenetics, suggests this approach could have significant benefits for patients and health systems. However, due to study design heterogeneity and the quality of the included studies, it is difficult to draw generalisable conclusions. Further pragmatic, robust pharmacogenetics studies in diverse, real-world patient populations, are required to establish the benefit of multi-medicine pharmacogenetic screening on patient outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据