4.1 Article

The Secrets of the Frogs Heart

期刊

PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 1471-1480

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-022-02870-8

关键词

Congenital heart defects; Heart; Single ventricle; Truncus arteriosus; Xenopus Laevis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The unique cardiac anatomy and physiological characteristics of the African clawed frog, including balanced circulation and low metabolic rate, were studied through anatomical dissection, echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Key findings include intact interatrial septum, separate atrio-ventricular valves, single spongiform ventricular cavity, and a valve-like spiral structure in the conus arteriosus.
The heart of the African clawed frog has a double-inlet and single-outlet ventricle supporting systemic and pulmonary circulations via a truncus, and a lifespan of 25-30 years. We sought to understand the unique cardiac anatomic and physiologic characteristics, with balanced circulation and low metabolic rate, by comparing the basic anatomy structures with focused echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty-four adult female African clawed frogs were randomly subjected to anatomic dissection (n = 4), echocardiography (n = 10), and cardiac magnetic resonance (n = 10). All anatomical features were confirmed and compared with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The main characteristics of the cardiovascular circulation in frogs are the following: Intact interatrial septum, with two separate atrio-ventricular valves, preventing atrial mixing of oxygenated and desaturated blood. Single spongiform ventricular cavity, non-conducive for homogeneous mixing. Single outlet with a valve-like mobile spiral structure, actively streaming into systemic and pulmonary arteries. Intact interatrial septum, spongiform ventricle, and valve-like spiral in the conus arteriosus are likely responsible for balanced systemic and pulmonary circulation in frogs, in spite of double-inlet and single-outlet ventricle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据