4.7 Article

Scene-specific crowd counting using synthetic training images

期刊

PATTERN RECOGNITION
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108484

关键词

Crowd counting; Scene-specific settings; Synthetic training images

资金

  1. project Law Enforcement agencies human factor methods and Toolkit for the Security and protection of CROWDs in mass gatherings (LETSCROWD), EU Horizon 2020 programme [740466]
  2. project IMaging MAnagement Guidelines and Informatics Network for law enforcement Agencies (IMMAGINA) , European Space Agency, ARTES Integrated Applications Promotion Programme [4000133110/20/NL/AF]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [740466] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a method for automatically generating a synthetic image training set for crowd counting in application scenarios where representative images are lacking. Experimental results show that this method can improve the effectiveness of existing crowd counting methods.
Crowd counting is a computer vision task on which considerable progress has recently been made thanks to convolutional neural networks. However, it remains a challenging task even in scene-specific settings, in real-world application scenarios where no representative images of the target scene are available, not even unlabelled, for training or fine-tuning a crowd counting model. Inspired by previous work in other computer vision tasks, we propose a simple but effective solution for the above application scenario, which consists of automatically building a scene-specific training set of synthetic images. Our solution does not require from end-users any manual annotation effort nor the collection of representative images of the target scene. Extensive experiments on several benchmark data sets show that the proposed solution can improve the effectiveness of existing crowd counting methods. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据