4.6 Article

Altered pain sensitivity in 5xfamilial Alzheimer disease mice is associated with dendritic spine loss in anterior cingulate cortex pyramidal neurons

期刊

PAIN
卷 163, 期 11, 页码 2138-2153

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002648

关键词

Alzheimer disease; Chronic pain; ACC; Hypesthesia; Dendritic spine

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation of China [62127810, 31701217, 81970418]
  2. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Health Identification and Assessment [21DZ2271000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research indicates that abnormal pain sensitivity in Alzheimer's disease modeling mice is closely related to changes in neuronal activity and dendritic spine loss in ACC pyramidal neurons, highlighting the crucial role of dendritic spine density in pain processing.
Chronic pain is highly prevalent. Individuals with cognitive disorders such as Alzheimer disease are a susceptible population in which pain is frequently difficult to diagnosis. It is still unclear whether the pathological changes in patients with Alzheimer disease will affect pain processing. Here, we leverage animal behavior, neural activity recording, optogenetics, chemogenetics, and Alzheimer disease modeling to examine the contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) neurons to pain response. The 5x familial Alzheimer disease mice show alleviated mechanical allodynia which can be regained by the genetic activation of ACC excitatory neurons. Furthermore, the lower peak neuronal excitation, delayed response initiation, as well as the dendritic spine reduction of ACC pyramidal neurons in 5xfamilial Alzheimer disease mice can be mimicked by Rac1 or actin polymerization inhibitor in wild-type (WT) mice. These findings indicate that abnormal of pain sensitivity in Alzheimer disease modeling mice is closely related to the variation of neuronal activity and dendritic spine loss in ACC pyramidal neurons, suggesting the crucial role of dendritic spine density in pain processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据