4.6 Article

Knee-extensor strength, symptoms, and need for surgery after two, four, or six exercise sessions/week using a home-based one-exercise program: a randomized dose-response trial of knee-extensor resistance exercise in patients eligible for knee replacement (the QUADX-1 trial)

期刊

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 973-986

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.04.001

关键词

Knee osteoarthritis; Knee-extensor resistance exercise; Dose-response; Knee replacement; Coordinated non-surgical and surgical care

资金

  1. Capital Region's strategic funds [R142-A5363]
  2. Capital Region's foundation for cross-continuum research [P-2015-1-01, P-2018-1-02, P-2019-1-03, 2019-800]
  3. Danish Rheumatism Association [R156A4923]
  4. Copenhagen University Hospital Amager-Hvidovre's strategic funds [2019-800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of different dosages of home-based knee-extensor resistance exercise in knee replacement patients and its impact on symptoms, physical function, and surgery decisions. The results showed no significant differences in isometric knee-extensor strength among the groups performing 2, 4, or 6 exercise sessions per week. Additionally, only one-third of the patients decided to undergo surgery after the exercise intervention.
Objective: To investigate firstly the efficacy of three different dosages of one home-based, knee-extensor resistance exercise on knee-extensor strength in patients eligible for knee replacement, and secondly, the influence of exercise on symptoms, physical function and decision on surgery. Method: One-hundred and forty patients eligible for knee replacement were randomized to three groups: 2, 4 or 6 home-based knee-extensor resistance exercise-sessions per week (group 2, 4 and 6 respectively) for 12 weeks. Primary outcome: isometric knee-extensor strength. Secondary outcomes: Oxford Knee Score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, average knee pain last week (0-10 numeric rating scale), 6-min walk test, stair climbing test, exercise adherence and need for surgery. Results: Primary analysis: Intention-to-treat analysis of 140 patients did not find statistically significant differences between the groups from baseline to after 12 weeks of exercise in isometric knee-extensor strength: Group 2 vs 4 (0.003 Nm/kg (0.2%) [95% CI -0.15 to 0.15], P = 0.965) and group 4 vs 6 (-0.04 Nm/kg (-2.7%) [95% CI -0.15 to 0.12], P = 0.628). Secondary analysis: Intention-to-treat analyses showed statistically significant differences between the two and six sessions/week groups in favor of the two sessions/week group for Oxford Knee Score: 4.8 OKS points (15.2%) [1.3 to 8.3], P = 0.008) and avg. knee pain last week (NRS 0-10): -1.3 NRS points (-19.5%) [-2.3 to -0.2], P = 0.018. After the 12-week exercise intervention, data were available for 117 patients (N = 39/group): 38 (32.5%) patients wanted surgery and 79 (67.5%) postponed surgery. This was independent of exercise dosage. Conclusion: In patients eligible for knee-replacement we found no between-group differences in isometric knee extensor strength after 2, 4 and 6 knee-extensor resistance exercise sessions per week. We saw no indication of an exercise dose-response relationship for isometric knee-extensor strength and only clinically irrelevant within group changes. For some secondary outcome (e.g., KOOS subscales) we found clinically relevant within group changes, which could help explain why only one in three patients decided to have surgery after the simple home-based exercise intervention. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据