4.7 Article

Exploration targeting of copper deposits using staged factor analysis, geochemical mineralization prospectivity index, and fractal model (Western Anti-Atlas, Morocco)

期刊

ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.104762

关键词

Copper potential mapping; Staged factor analysis; Geochemical mapping prospectivity index; (GMPI); C-A fractal model; P-A model; Morocco

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully identified the geochemical signatures of copper deposits in the Anti-Atlas region of Morocco using stream sediment data. It provides an approach for evaluating potential mineral resources.
The present work aims to identify the geochemical signatures of copper deposits in the Igherm area (Anti-Atlas, Morocco) using stream sediment data. We applied factor analysis on the data normalized by log transformation. This approach identified three geochemical data associations (F1, F2, and F3) which were then used to calculate the values of the geochemical prospectivity index (GPMI). The results indicated that the large GMPI Cu values correlate strongly with the surface indices. A concentration-surface (C-A) fractal classification was applied to separate the geochemical anomalies from the regional background. To recognize and geo-position the significant geochemical signatures of the deposit, we applied the prediction zone (P-A) plot. A geographic information system (GIS) was used to define the spatial distribution of the anomalies at the sub-watershed level. The results represent the first approach to evaluating potential mineral resources at the scale of the Anti-Atlas: 90% of the anomalous sub-catchments mapped are located along the Precambrian-Cambrian transition (Base Series), 67% are traversed by major tectonic faults, and 40% contain copper showings and/or deposits. The remaining 60% are devoid of any visible surface copper occurrences. They constitute promising areas for future exploration of Cu deposits hidden under the Cambrian cover.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据