4.5 Article

Light scattering effect of iron doped zinc oxide thin films through structural and optical analysis

期刊

OPTIK
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168704

关键词

Zinc oxide; Thin films; Optical modelling; Scalar scattering transmittance; Haze factor

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the structural and optical properties of sprayed Zn1-xFexO (ZFO) thin films through experimental characterizations and theoretical calculations. The substitution of Zn2+ ions by iron ions in ZFO films was confirmed, leading to a noticeable redshift in the emission peak. The scalar scattering theory within the Rayleigh scattering formula was used to calculate the simulated haze factor, showing a strong correlation between crystalline quality, surface morphology, and optical properties.
Herein, structural, and optical properties of the sprayed Zn1-xFexO (ZFO) thin films, with 0 < x < 0.15, have been investigated, by combining experimental characterizations, and theoretical calculations of the light scattering properties. The X-ray diffraction patterns displays a hexagonal wurtzite structure of the polycrystalline films, with c-axis orientation. The iron ions substitution of Zn2+ ions, was confirmed by XRD, Raman and photoluminescence measurements. Furthermore, an obvious redshift in the near band edge emission peak was also observed by photoluminescence analysis which is attributed to the band structure deformation in ZnO thin films. The resulting optical data indicated a strong correlation between the haze factor, crystalline quality, and the surface morphology feature. The scalar scattering theory within the Rayleigh scattering formula, was used to calculate the simulated haze factor, for the two optimized ZFO thin films, through crystalline quality and surface roughness, namely, the synthetized ZFO film with a 5at% and 7at% iron concentration. A good agreement with the scalar scattering theory is obtained, for the haze factor relative to the transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据