4.5 Article

Temperature dependent bandgap in NaBi(WO4)2 single crystals

期刊

OPTIK
卷 258, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168811

关键词

Double tungstates; NaBi(WO4)(2); NaBi(MoO4)(2); Optical properties; Electronic structure

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, sodium bismuth tungstate single crystals were grown using the Czochralski method and their optical properties were investigated. The results showed that the absorption edge shifted to higher energies with decreasing temperature, indicating an increase in the direct band gap energy. The temperature dependency of the band gap was analyzed and the optical parameters were determined using the Varshni model. The study also determined the Urbach energies for different temperatures.
The double tungstates have been an attractive research interest due to their optoelectronic applications. In the present work, NaBi(WO4)(2), one of the members of double tungstates family, was grown by Czochralski method as single crystal form and optically investigated. X-ray diffraction pattern presented three peaks associated with tetragonal scheelite crystalline structure. Optical properties of the crystal were studied by performing temperature-dependent transmission measurements between 10 and 300 K. The shift of the absorption edge to higher energies was observed with decrease of temperature. The analyses indicated that direct band gap energy increases from 3.50 to 3.60 eV when the temperature was decreased from room temperature to 10 K. The temperature dependency of bandgap was studied considering the Varshni model and fitting of the experimental data under the light of model presented the optical parameters of band gap energy at 0 K, rate of band gap change with temperature and Debye temperature as E-g(0) = 3.61 eV, gamma = 8.83 x 10(-4) eV/K and beta = 456 K, respectively. Urbach energies were also determined from the analyses as 122 and 113 meV for 10 and 300 K experimental data, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据