4.6 Article

Resolving the subwavelength width of nanoslits by full-Stokes polarization analysis of scattered light

期刊

OPTICS LETTERS
卷 47, 期 11, 页码 2654-2657

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OL.455057

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFB2007501]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11674303, U20A20216]
  3. Anhui Provincial Science and Technology Major Projects [18030901005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study overcomes the diffraction limit of optical microscopy in resolving subwavelength nanoslits by measuring the full Stokes parameters of the scattered field. The state of polarization of the scattered light strongly depends on the slit width for subwavelength nanoslits, providing a new far-field optical technique to determine their width accurately.
Due to the diffraction limit, subwavelength nanoslits (whose width is strictly smaller than lambda/2) are hard to resolve by optical microscopy. Here, we overcome the diffraction limit by measuring the full Stokes parameters of the scattered field of the subwavelength nanoslits with varying width under the illumination of a linearly-polarized laser with a 45 degrees polarization orientation angle. Because of the depolarization effect arising from the different phase delay and amplitude transmittance for TM polarization (perpendicular to the long axis of slit) and TE polarization (parallel to the long axis of slit), the state of polarization (SOP) of the scattered light strongly depends on the slit width for subwavelength nanoslits. After correcting for residual background light, the nanoslit width measured by the SOP of scattered light is consistent with the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurement. The simulation and experiment in this work demonstrate a new far-field optical technique to determine the width of subwavelength nanoslits by studying the SOP of the scattered light. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据