4.6 Article

Temperature compensated fiber optic magnetic sensor based on the combination interference principle

期刊

OPTICS LETTERS
卷 47, 期 10, 页码 2558-2561

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OL.456552

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61903073]
  2. Central University Basic Research Fund of China [N2204013]
  3. Australian Research Council [FT200100154]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [F2020501040]
  5. Australian Research Council [FT200100154] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes and verifies a highly sensitive temperature compensated fiber optic magnetic field sensor using Sagnac and Mach-Zehnder combination interference (SMZI). The sensor relies on microstructured exposed core fiber filled with ethanol and magnetic fluid. It achieves high magnetic sensitivity and temperature sensitivity, with good repeatability and low detection limits.
In this paper, a highly sensitive temperature compensated fiber optic magnetic field sensor by Sagnac and Mach-Zehnder combination interference (SMZI) is proposed and verified. The sensing structure relies on microstructured exposed core fiber (ECF) filled with ethanol and magnetic fluid (MF). The refractive index of MF and ethanol is affected by the magnetic field and temperature (MFT). SMZI is based on the multimode and birefringence characteristics of ECF. The measurement principle is that the spectra of Sagnac interference and Mach-Zehnder interference have respective sensitivities to the Mil'. The magnetic sensitivity can reach 1.17 nm/mT, and the temperature sensitivity is up to -1.93 nm/degrees C. At the same time, the sensor has good repeatability and low detection limits of 0.41 mT and 0.25 degrees C, respectively. It not only solves the cross-influence of temperature but also makes the spectral analysis more intuitive. The sensor has a broad development prospect in the application of MFT detection. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据