4.6 Article

Small-core hollow-core nested antiresonant nodeless fiber with semi-circular tubes

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 20373-20388

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.460185

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61935002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hollow-core nested anti-resonant nodeless fibers (HC-NANFs) with a small-core structure and optimized design show low confinement loss, bending loss, and coupling loss. The fiber exhibits a large bandwidth, effective single-mode operation, and potential for high birefringence performance. It is suitable for short-haul applications in laser-based gas sensing, miniaturized fiber sensing, etc.
Hollow-core nested anti-resonant nodeless fibers (HC-NANFs) exhibit great performance in low loss and large bandwidth. Large core sizes are usually used to reduce confinement losses, but meanwhile, bring side effects such as high bending and coupling losses. This study proposes a small-core HC-NANF with a relatively low confinement loss. Semi-circular tubes (SCTs) are added to constitute the core boundary and reduce the fiber-core radius (R). Double NANFs tubes and single-ring tubes are added inside the SCB to reduce loss. Simulation results show that the optimized structure with R of 5 mu m has confinement loss and total loss of 0.687 dB/km and 4.27 dB/km at 1.55 mu m, respectively. The bending loss is less than 10 dB/km at 1.4 similar to 1.6 mu m with a bending radius of 10 mm. The direct coupling loss with standard single mode fiber is greatly reduced to similar to 0.125 dB compared to other HC-NANFs. The modified structure of HC-NANFs also shows a large bandwidth, effective single-mode operation, potentially high birefringence performance, and remarkable robustness of the optimized structure parameters, making it suitable for short-haul applications in laser-based gas sensing, miniaturized fiber sensing, etc. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据