4.6 Article

Efficient multi-step coupling between Si3N4 waveguides and CMOS plasmonic ferroelectric phase shifters in the O-band

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 30, 期 15, 页码 26988-27003

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.457484

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. H2020 LEIT Information and Communication Technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a thorough simulation-based analysis for the design of multi-step couplers bridging seamlessly plasmonic barium titanate oxide (BTO) ferroelectric phase shifters and thick silicon nitride (Si3N4) waveguides for the O-band. The proposed plasmonic platforms are formed by CMOS-compatible Copper (Cu) material and include hybrid plasmonic waveguides (HPW) and plasmonic metal-insulator-metal (MIM) slot waveguides. Numerical simulations are conducted to identify the optimum geometries, resulting in coupling losses of 1.75dB for the HPW geometry and 1.29dB for the MIM configuration, with confinement factors of 31.39% and 56.2%, respectively.
In this paper we present a thorough simulation-based analysis for the design of multi-step couplers bridging seamlessly plasmonic barium titanate oxide (BTO) ferroelectric phase shifters and thick silicon nitride (Si3N4) waveguides for the O-band. The targeted plasmonic waveguides are a hybrid plasmonic waveguide (HPW) providing low propagation losses and a plasmonic metal-insulator-metal (MIM) slot waveguide offering a high confinement factor for high modulation efficiency. The proposed plasmonic platforms are formed by Copper (Cu) providing CMOS compatibility. The analysis is based on 2D-FD eigenvalue and 3D-FDTD numerical simulations targeting to identify the optimum geometries ensuring the lowest coupling losses, calculated as 1.75dB for the HPW geometry and 1.29dB for the MIM configuration. The corresponding confinement factors are 31.39% and 56.2% for the HPW and MIM waveguides, respectively. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据