4.5 Article

Activation experiment and spectral response properties analysis of graded-bandgap AlGaAs/GaAs electron-injection cathode

期刊

OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 508, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2021.127689

关键词

Negative electron affinity; Electron-injection cathode; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; Quantum efficiency

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11875012, 61661002, 62061001, 61961001]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province, China [20192ACBL20003, 20181BAB202026, 20202BAB202013]
  3. Jiangxi Double Thousand Plan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a cesium/oxygen activation experiment was conducted on a gallium-arsenide-based electron-injection cathode in an ultra-high vacuum system. The residual impurities on the cathode surface and the thin emitter layer were found to result in a low cathode emission capacity and quantum efficiency.
A cesium/oxygen activation experiment was conducted on a gallium-arsenide-based electron-injection cathode in an ultra-high vacuum system connected to a spectral response measuring instrument. Before activation, high-temperature cleaning was performed at 650 C to obtain an atomically clean surface. The cathode surface impurities before and after the experiment were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Because of the cathode Ti/Pt/Au electrode properties, the sample could not be cleaned chemically. High-temperature cathode treatment before activation could not remove the oxides completely, which led to a low cathode emission capacity in the photocurrent and spectral response. The experimental quantum efficiency curve was fitted by a two-minima diffusion model, and parameters, such as the electron diffusion length and escape probability, which characterize the cathode performance, were calculated. According to the fitting results, the residual impurities on the cathode surface and the thin emitter layer resulted in a low probability of electron escape, which resulted in a low quantum efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据