4.6 Article

Enhanced electrical and optoelectronic properties of W doped SnO2 thin films

期刊

OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112234

关键词

Thin films; W doped SnO2; Spray pyrolysis method; X-ray diffraction; Electrical properties; Figure of merit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, undoped tin oxide and tungsten-doped tin oxide thin films were prepared by homemade spray pyrolysis technique with different doping levels of W. The W doping was found to slightly modify the surface morphology and optical properties of the SnO2 thin films.
In the present study, undoped tin oxide (SnO2) and tungsten (W) doped tin oxide (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 wt% of W doping) thin films were deposited by the homemade spray pyrolysis technique and their structural, micro structural, optical, electrical, and optoelectronic properties are described. X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed that all the prepared thin films belonged to a tetragonal crystal structure with a space group of P4(2)/mnm. The elemental oxidation state of Sn4+, O(2-)and W6+ was confirmed by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. The scanning electron microscopy revealed that the surface morphology of SnO2 thin films was slightly modified by W doping. The presence of Sn, O and W and their elemental compositions were confirmed using the energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The 3 wt% of W doped SnO2 (SnO2:W) thin films showed maximum optical transmittance of about 90% in the visible and NIR region. The direct optical bandgap varied between 3.60 eV and 3.84 eV. Photoluminescence spectra showed noticeable enhancement in the UV emission peak at 362 nm and green emission peak at 525 nm of SnO2:W thin films. The high charge carrier concentration of 2.89 x 10(20) cm(-3) was observed for 3 wt% of W doping. The Hall mobility of the undoped SnO2 thin films was found to be 94 cm(2)/Vs. A high figure of merit of 8.30 x 10(-3) Omega(-1) was obtained for the thin films doped with 3 wt% of W.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据