4.6 Article

Structural and luminescent properties of CQDs produced by microwave and conventional hydrothermal methods using pelagic Sargassum as carbon source

期刊

OPTICAL MATERIALS
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112156

关键词

Carbon quantum dots; Pelagic Sargassum; Luminescent properties; Microwave assisted synthesis

资金

  1. CONACyT
  2. SIP-IPN
  3. Instituto Politecnico Nacional (IPN, Mexico) [20195500, 20201679, 20210624, 20211381, 20210918]
  4. CONACyT (Mexico) [1668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research compares the structural and luminescent properties of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) synthesized by two different methods and under different conditions. The microwave method achieves better mass yield, while the conventional hydrothermal method generates higher quantum yield. This study helps to further understand and optimize the synthesis process of CQDs.
The synthesis of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) from biomass could be the best application for biopolymeric materials with no further use in industry and that can have environmental effects when disposed of, such as pelagic Sargassum. This research compared the structural and luminescent properties of CQDs synthetized by two different methods (microwave and conventional hydrothermal synthesis) using pelagic Sargassum extract as a carbon source. The microwave method resulted in a better mass yield, while hydrothermal synthesis generated the best quantum yield (QY). Under optimized synthesis conditions, no statistical differences were observed in CQDs size or surface functional groups, as detected by TEM and FTIR analyses respectively. However, crystalline structure and light absorption varied between samples, explaining the higher values of QY observed in the conventional hydrothermal method. This study thus assists in furthering the understanding of the synthesis process, as well as providing supporting evidence for which synthesis methods are better for CDQ synthesis depending on the future uses of these nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据