4.7 Article

Game Changer: Health Professionals' Views on the Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA Testing in Hereditary Cancer Syndrome Management

期刊

ONCOLOGIST
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 E393-E401

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac039

关键词

circulating tumor DNA; cancer detection; genomics; hereditary cancer syndromes; clinical utility

类别

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CIHR-159453]
  2. CIHR New Investigator Award
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [GSD-425969]
  4. Research Training Centre at St. Michael's Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the views of health professionals on the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in the management of hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS). The study finds that professionals have varying opinions on the use of ctDNA testing, with some optimistic about its potential to transform early cancer detection, while others are hesitant due to concerns about invasiveness and limited utility.
Background We explored health professionals' views on the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in hereditary cancer syndrome (HCS) management. Materials and Methods A qualitative interpretive description study was conducted, using semi-structured interviews with professionals across Canada. Thematic analysis employing constant comparison was used for analysis. 2 investigators coded each transcript. Differences were reconciled through discussion and the codebook was modified as new codes and themes emerged from the data. Results Thirty-five professionals participated and included genetic counselors (n = 12), geneticists (n = 9), oncologists (n = 4), family doctors (n = 3), lab directors and scientists (n = 3), a health-system decision maker, a surgeon, a pathologist, and a nurse. Professionals described ctDNA as transformative and a game-changer. However, they were divided on its use in HCS management, with some being optimistic (optimists) while others were hesitant (pessimists). Differences were driven by views on 3 factors: (1) clinical utility, (2) ctDNA's role in cancer screening, and (3) ctDNA's invasiveness. Optimists anticipated ctDNA testing would have clinical utility for HCS patients, its role would be akin to a diagnostic test and would be less invasive than standard screening (eg imaging). Pessimistic participants felt ctDNA testing would add limited utility; it would effectively be another screening test in the pathway, likely triggering additional investigations downstream, thereby increasing invasiveness. Conclusions Providers anticipated ctDNA testing will transform early cancer detection for HCS families. However, the contrasting positions on ctDNA's role in the care pathway raise potential practice variations, highlighting a need to develop evidence to support clinical implementation and guidelines to standardize adoption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据