4.3 Article

Pathophysiological Considerations in Periorbital Necrotizing Fasciitis: A Case Report

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2022.2032190

关键词

Periorbital necrotizing fasciitis; Streptococcus pyogenes; Staphylococcus aureus; superantigens; toxic shock syndrome; antibiotic; surgical debridement

资金

  1. Lungen- und Atmungsstiftung Bern
  2. Stiftung Lindenhof Bern [13-09-F]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Periorbital necrotizing fasciitis (PNF) is a rare complication of bacterial infection that leads to irreversible inflammatory destruction of soft tissues. Prompt identification and decisive interventions are crucial due to the rapid progression and potentially fatal consequences. We report a case of PNF caused by dual infection with Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus. Treatment with intravenous antibiotics and regular surgical debridements resulted in a beneficial outcome.
Background Periorbital necrotizing fasciitis (PNF) is a rare complication of bacterial infection, associated with irreversible inflammatory destruction of soft tissues like subcutaneous tissue and superficial fascia. PNF can cause visual loss, septic shock and death within hours to days. Since the infection progresses rapidly from a local disease to septic shock, prompt identification and decisive interventions are mandatory. Aim Considering pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and treatment options, we report a case of PNF and its outcome.Methods: A 69 years old male with febrile periorbital swelling had been diagnosed with bilateral PNF, caused by dual infection with Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) based on conjunctival swabs. Results The superantigens produced by S. pyogenes have been identified as key to the rapid dissemination of infection and severity of systemic manifestations. Conclusions A combination of intravenous antibiotics and regular surgical debridements resulted in a beneficial outcome in our patient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据