4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical analyses on buckling and strength failure of composite cylindrical shells under hydrostatic pressure

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 249, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110871

关键词

Buckling; Strength failure; Composite shells; Hydrostatic pressure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [51909219]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, China [2020M673492]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [3102019JC006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the buckling and strength failure of composite cylindrical shells under hydrostatic pressure through experimental tests and finite element method. The effects of various factors on the critical buckling pressure and strength failure pressure are discussed.
The buckling and strength failure of composite cylindrical shells under hydrostatic pressure are studied in this paper by experimental tests and finite element method. Experimental tests were carried out for three composite cylindrical shells with different stacking sequences. In parallel, finite element models are built to predict the buckling and strength failure pressures. The finite element results agree well with the corresponding experi-mental tests. A parametric study is conducted and the effects of length-radius ratio, thickness-radius ratio, ply angle and stacking sequence on the critical buckling pressure and strength failure pressure are discussed. The results show that length-radius ratio has little influence on the strength failure pressure while thickness-radius ratio, ply angle and stacking sequence have significant influences on the critical buckling pressure and strength failure pressure. The boundary line formed by the intersections between the critical buckling pressure and strength failure pressure of composite shells with same configuration is nonlinear and it is a function of length-radius ratio, thickness-radius ratio, ply angle and stacking sequence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据