4.8 Article

Pseudo-pseudogenes in bacterial genomes: Proteogenomics reveals a wide but low protein expression of pseudogenes in Salmonella enterica

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 9, 页码 5158-5170

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac302

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation, China [82072241, 31670132]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan [CMRPG3G1453, CMRPG3L0541, CMRPD1L0031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudogenes in bacterial genomes have long been considered nonfunctional, but this study found that many of these pseudogenes still have disrupted mRNA sequences and low-level protein expression. Fifteen pseudogenes were further confirmed to be expressed in vivo and affected bacterial pathogenesis in S. Typhi.
Pseudogenes (genes disrupted by frameshift or in-frame stop codons) are ubiquitously present in the bacterial genome and considered as nonfunctional fossil. Here, we used RNA-seq and mass-spectrometry technologies to measure the transcriptomes and proteomes of Salmonella enterica serovars Paratyphi A and Typhi. All pseudogenes' mRNA sequences remained disrupted, and were present at comparable levels to their intact homologs. At the protein level, however, 101 out of 161 pseudogenes suggested successful translation, with their low expression regardless of growth conditions, genetic background and pseudogenization causes. The majority of frameshifting detected was compensatory for -1 frameshift mutations. Readthrough of in-frame stop codons primarily involved UAG; and cytosine was the most frequent base adjacent to the codon. Using a fluorescence reporter system, fifteen pseudogenes were confirmed to express successfully in vivo in Escherichia coli. Expression of the intact copy of the fifteen pseudogenes in S. Typhi affected bacterial pathogenesis as revealed in human macrophage and epithelial cell infection models. The above findings suggest the need to revisit the nonstandard translation mechanism as well as the biological role of pseudogenes in the bacterial genome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据