4.4 Article

Ethanol and organic acid production related to the microbial population in sugarcane silages with admixed crambe (Crambe abyssinica Hochst) bran

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00288233.2022.2054826

关键词

Biofuels; fermentative profile; industrial by-product; response surface; storage time

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effects of admixed crambe bran (CB) on the characteristics of sugarcane silages during storage, including dry matter contents, growth of microorganisms, acidity values, organic acid, and ethanol production. The results showed that the addition of CB improved the fermentation profile and inhibited the growth of harmful microorganisms, thereby enhancing the quality of sugarcane silages. This is of great importance for the sustainable production of industrial biofuels from an environmental perspective.
The dry matter contents (DM), growth of colonies of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), enterobacteria (ENTERO), yeast fungi (YF), and filamentous fungi (FF), acidity values (pH), organic acid and ethanol production (ET), were evaluated for sugarcane silages with different ratios (LI) of admixed crambe bran (CB). The ratios were 0, 3, 10, 17 and 20% of the total silage mass, which were evaluated at different storage times (ST) (0, 3, 7, 12, 24, 36, 41 and 60 days after the ensilage). The results were statistically analyzed using response surface methodology. The DM contents were influenced by increasing CB levels in the mixture, as it increases the moisture absorption and provides a favourable environment for LAB development, to the detriment of harmful microorganisms in the sugarcane-crambe mixture. The CB controlled the growth of YF, reducing ET by over 50%. The use of CB in proportions of up to 20% is a viable alternative for improving the fermentation profile of sugarcane silages, provided that they are stored for at least 60 days. Moreover, the use of the CB improves the sustainability of the industrial production of biofuels from the environmental points of view.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据