4.1 Article

Antimicrobial effect of salicylamide derivatives against intestinal sulfate-reducing bacteria

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMEDICINE
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 125-130

出版社

UNIV SOUTH BOHEMIA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jab.2016.01.005

关键词

Sulfate-reducing bacteria; Desulfovibrio piger; Desulfomicrobium sp.; Salicylamides Bowel disease; Lipophilicity; Structure-activity relationships

资金

  1. IGA VFU Brno [44/2014/FaF]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
  3. VFU Brno [CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are most likely involved in both the initiation and maintenance of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); unfortunately present antibacterial chemotherapeutics used in the treatment of IBD have been ineffective. Thus, the antimicrobial activity of salicylamide derivatives against two different genera of intestinal SRB, Desulfovibrio and Desulfomicrobium, was investigated. Six 2-(phenylcarbamoyl) phenyl N-[(benzyloxy)carbonyl] alkanoates and three 2-hydroxy-N-[(2S)-1-oxo-1-(phenylamino)alkan-2-yl]benzamides showed MIC values in the range from 0.22 to 0.35 mu M against Desulfovibrio piger Vib-7 and in the range from 0.27 to 8.52 mu M against Desulfomicrobium sp. Rod-9, while MIC values of ciprofloxacin were 41.2 mu M and 39.3 mu M. The highest potency against the two strains was observed for 4-chloro-N-{(2S)-1-[(3,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]-3-methyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl}-2-hydroxybenzamide (MIC 0.22 mu M and 0.27 mu M). 4-Chloro-2-[(4-nitrophenyl) carbamoyl]phenyl (2S)-2-{[(benzyloxy)carbonyl]amino}-3-methylbutanoate showed high activity against D. piger Vib-7 (MIC = 0.26 mu M), while 4-chloro-2-[(4-methylphenyl)carbamoyl]phenyl (2S)-2-[( tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino]-3-(1H-indol-2-yl) propanoate expressed high activity against Desulfomicrobium sp. Rod-9 (MIC = 0.31 mu M). Structure-activity relationships are discussed. (C) 2016 Faculty of Health and Social Studies, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据