4.8 Article

CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 386, 期 17, 页码 1591-1602

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200963

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [EC-GA 603266]
  2. Berlin Institute of Health
  3. Rigshospitalet of the University of Copenhagen
  4. Centre of Research Excellence grant from the British Heart Foundation [RE/18/6/34217]
  5. Radiomics Priority Program grants [DE 1361/19-1 [428222922], DE 1361/20-1 [428223139], SPP2177/1]
  6. German Research Foundation [GRK 2260/1 [289347353]]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the effectiveness of CT and ICA in diagnosing obstructive CAD. The results showed that among patients with stable chest pain and intermediate pretest probability of CAD, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was similar between the CT group and the ICA group. However, the frequency of major procedure-related complications was lower in the CT group.
BACKGROUND In the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), computed tomography (CT) is an accurate, noninvasive alternative to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA in the management of CAD to reduce the frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events is uncertain. METHODS We conducted a pragmatic, randomized trial comparing CT with ICA as initial diagnostic imaging strategies for guiding the treatment of patients with stable chest pain who had an intermediate pretest probability of obstructive CAD and were referred for ICA at one of 26 European centers. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) over 3.5 years. Key secondary outcomes were procedure-related complications and angina pectoris. RESULTS Among 3561 patients (56.2% of whom were women), follow-up was complete for 3523 (98.9%). Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 38 of 1808 patients (2.1%) in the CT group and in 52 of 1753 (3.0%) in the ICA group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI), 0.46 to 1.07; P=0.10). Major procedure-related complications occurred in 9 patients (0.5%) in the CT group and in 33 (1.9%) in the ICA group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.55). Angina during the final 4 weeks of follow-up was reported in 8.8% of the patients in the CT group and in 7.5% of those in the ICA group (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.48). CONCLUSIONS Among patients referred for ICA because of stable chest pain and intermediate pretest probability of CAD, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was similar in the CT group and the ICA group. The frequency of major procedure-related complications was lower with an initial CT strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据