4.5 Review

The Dual Nature of Microglia in Alzheimer's Disease: A Microglia-Neuron Crosstalk Perspective

期刊

NEUROSCIENTIST
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 616-638

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10738584211070273

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; microglia; neuron; cellular interaction; neurodegeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microglia play a critical role in Alzheimer's disease, but whether they have a positive or negative effect remains controversial. Their interaction with neurons is key, as they can prune synapses causing excessive loss, but they can also promote synapse formation and enhance neural network plasticity. Additionally, microglia have dual opposing roles in the development of major pathological features in the disease.
Microglia are critical players in the neuroimmune system, and their involvement in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis is increasingly being recognized. However, whether microglia play a positive or negative role in AD remains largely controversial and the precise molecular targets for intervention are not well defined. This partly results from the opposing roles of microglia in AD pathology, and is mainly reflected in the microglia-neuron interaction. Microglia can prune synapses resulting in excessive synapse loss and neuronal dysfunction, but they can also promote synapse formation, enhancing neural network plasticity. Neuroimmune crosstalk accelerates microglial activation, which induces neuron death and enhances the microglial phagocytosis of beta-amyloid to protect neurons. Moreover, microglia have dual opposing roles in developing the major pathological features in AD, such as amyloid deposition and blood-brain barrier permeability. This review summarizes the dual opposing role of microglia in AD from the perspective of the interaction between neurons and microglia. Additionally, current AD treatments targeting microglia and the advantages and disadvantages of developing microglia-targeted therapeutic strategies are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据