4.7 Article

Symptom dimensions to address heterogeneity in tinnitus

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104542

关键词

Tinnitus dimensions; Tinnitus heterogeneity; Tinnitus frameworks; Hearing loss and tinnitus; Auditory cortex; Parahippocampus; Tinnitus networks

资金

  1. Government of Ireland Postdoctoral Fellowship [2020-2022, GOIPD/2020/663]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tinnitus is a heterogeneous disorder that is difficult to classify based on clinical profiles. This article proposes a framework that views tinnitus as a dimensional disorder and explores the interactions between different dimensions to determine the characteristics of tinnitus. This perspective can enhance our understanding of tinnitus and improve treatment strategies.
Tinnitus, the auditory phantom percept, is a well-known heterogenous disorder with multiple subtypes. Researchers and clinicians have tried to classify these subtypes according to clinical profiles, aetiologies, and response to treatment with little success. The occurrence of overlapping tinnitus subtypes suggests that the disorder exists along a continuum of severity, with no clear distinct boundaries. In this perspective, we propose a neuro-mechanical framework, viewing tinnitus as a dimensional disorder which is a complex interplay of its behavioural, biological and neurophysiological phenotypes. Moreover, we explore the potential of these dimensions as interacting networks without a common existing cause, giving rise to tinnitus. Considering tinnitus as partially overlapping, dynamically changing, interacting networks, each representing a different aspect of the unified tinnitus percept, suggests that the interaction of these networks determines the phenomenology of the tinnitus, ultimately leading to a dimensional spectrum, rather than a categorical subtyping. A combination of a robust theoretical framework and strong empirical evidence can advance our understanding of the functional mechanisms underlying tinnitus and ultimately, improve treatment strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据