4.7 Editorial Material

Ethical Guidance for Neuroprognostication in Disorders of Consciousness

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 98, 期 17, 页码 701-702

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200574

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

These studies demonstrate international variability in treatment and conflicts in decision-making regarding patients with disorders of consciousness, involving conflicts between physicians, family members, and patients, as well as variation between treatment centers.
In the United States, 4.8 million individuals present to the emergency department for traumatic brain injury (TBI) evaluation and 2.9 million are diagnosed with TBI every year. Approximately 224,000 are hospitalized due to injury severity.(1) Recent studies have demonstrated variability and conflicts in decision-making surrounding withdrawal or limitation of care (WLC). One study that looked at a decade of deaths (54% related to WLC) at a level 1 trauma center in the United States found decision-making conflicts between physicians and family (57%), between family members (33%), and between patients and family members (9.5%).(2) Although 68% of WLC cases were from a similar US level 1 trauma treatment center study, there were differences in TBI severity (64% for severe TBI and 92% for moderate TBI) and both within-center and between-center variation in decision-making.(3) Finally, although about 70% of deaths were associated with WLC in a 2-year retrospective cohort study at 6 Canadian level 1 trauma centers, there was variability between treatment centers (45%-87%).(4) These studies demonstrate an international trend for variability in treatment and conflicts in decision-making regarding WLC for patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据