4.7 Article

Association Between EEG Patterns and Serum Neurofilament Light After Cardiac Arrest A Post Hoc Analysis of the TTM Trial

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 98, 期 24, 页码 E2487-E2498

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200335

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Heart Lung Foundation
  3. Arbetsmarknadens Forsakringsaktiebolag Insurance Foundation
  4. Skane University Hospital Foundations
  5. GyllenstiernaKrapperup Foundation
  6. Swedish National Health System, the County Council of Skane
  7. Swedish Society of Medicine
  8. Koch Foundation
  9. TrygFonden (Denmark)
  10. European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network
  11. Thelma Zoega Foundation
  12. Stig and Ragna Gorthon Foundation
  13. Thure Carlsson Foundation
  14. Hans-Gabriel and Alice TrolleWachtmeister Foundation for Medical Research
  15. Lions Research fund Skane
  16. South Swedish Hospital Region Research Funds
  17. Swedish Brain Foundation
  18. Lundbeck Foundation
  19. Torsten Soderberg foundation at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the relationship between EEG and neuroaxonal injury marker neurofilament light (NfL), as well as their association with brain injury severity. The findings showed that highly malignant EEG patterns were associated with higher NfL levels, and both EEG background and discharges were strongly correlated with NfL levels. The association between EEG background and NfL levels was stronger than that between superimposed discharges and NfL levels. Combining EEG and NfL measurements can help better identify misclassified patients using single methods.
Background and Objectives EEG is widely used for prediction of neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. To better understand the relationship between EEG and neuronal injury, we explored the association between EEG and neurofilament light (NfL) as a marker of neuroaxonal injury, evaluated whether highly malignant EEG patterns are reflected by high NfL levels, and explored the association of EEG backgrounds and EEG discharges with NfL. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of the Target Temperature Management After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest trial. Routine EEGs were prospectively performed after the temperature intervention >= 36 hours postarrest. Patients who awoke or died prior to 36 hours postarrest were excluded. EEG experts blinded to clinical information classified EEG background, amount of discharges, and highly malignant EEG patterns according to the standardized American Clinical Neurophysiology Society terminology. Prospectively collected serum samples were analyzed for NfL after trial completion. The highest available concentration at 48 or 72 hours postarrest was used. Results A total of 262/939 patients with EEG and NfL data were included. Patients with highly malignant EEG patterns had 2.9 times higher NfL levels than patients with malignant patterns and NfL levels were 13 times higher in patients with malignant patterns than those with benign patterns (95% CI 1.4-6.1 and 6.5-26.2, respectively; effect size 0.47; p < 0.001). Both background and the amount of discharges were independently strongly associated with NfL levels (p < 0.001). The EEG background had a stronger association with NfL levels than EEG discharges (R-2 = 0.30 and R-2 = 0.10, respectively). NfL levels in patients with a continuous background were lower than for any other background (95% CI for discontinuous, burst-suppression, and suppression, respectively: 2.26-18.06, 3.91-41.71, and 5.74-41.74; effect size 0.30; p < 0.001 for all). NfL levels did not differ between suppression and burst suppression. Superimposed discharges were only associated with higher NfL levels if the EEG background was continuous. Discussion Benign, malignant, and highly malignant EEG patterns reflect the extent of brain injury as measured by NfL in serum. The extent of brain injury is more strongly related to the EEG background than superimposed discharges. Combining EEG and NfL may be useful to better identify patients misclassified by single methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据