4.5 Article

3D Face Recognition Using a Fusion of PCA and ICA Convolution Descriptors

期刊

NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS
卷 54, 期 4, 页码 3507-3527

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11063-022-10761-5

关键词

Filter bank; Deep convolutional neural network; Cascaded linear convolutional network; PICANet; Hybrid network

资金

  1. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Govt. of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a hybrid filter bank-based convolutional network for 3D face recognition system. By utilizing hybridization technique for feature representation and extraction, the proposed system demonstrates a simple network structure and high computational efficiency, achieving satisfactory recognition rates on three different databases.
This paper introduces a hybrid filter bank-based convolutional network to develop a 3D face recognition system in different orientations. The filter banks approach has been mainly used for feature representation. The hybridization in filter banks is primarily generated by a fusion of principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) filters. Currently, the deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) has taken a significant step for improving the classification compared to other learning, though the feature learning mechanism of DCNN is not definite. We have used the cascaded linear convolutional network for 3D face classification using a composite filter-based network named PICANet. The networks consist of different layers: convolutional layer, nonlinear processing layer, pooling layer, and classification layer. The main advantage of these networks over DCNN is that the network structure is simple and computationally efficient. We have tested the proposed system on three accessible 3D face databases: Frav3D, GavabDB, and Casia3D. Considering different faces in Frav3D, GavabDB, and Casia3D, the system acquired 96.93%, 87.7%, and 89.21% recognition rates using the proposed hybrid network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据