4.7 Article

A neuroscience-inspired spiking neural network for EEG-based auditory spatial attention detection

期刊

NEURAL NETWORKS
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 555-565

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.05.003

关键词

EEG; Spiking neurons; Auditory attention; Connectivity; Sparse coding

资金

  1. Singapore Government [A18A2b0046, A1687b0033]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - University of Bremen, Germany [EXC 2077]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a spiking neural network model for auditory spatial attention detection, showing improved accuracy with the use of limited training data. The model leverages the role of sparse coding in cognitive tasks and brain-inspired machine learning.
Recent studies have shown that alpha oscillations (8-13 Hz) enable the decoding of auditory spatial attention. Inspired by sparse coding in cortical neurons, we propose a spiking neural network model for auditory spatial attention detection. The proposed model can extract the patterns of recorded EEG of leftward and rightward attention, independently, and uses them to train the network to detect auditory spatial attention. Specifically, our model is composed of three layers, two of which are Integrate and Fire spiking neurons. We formulate a new learning rule that is based on the firing rate of pre- and post-synaptic neurons in the first and second layers of spiking neurons. The third layer has 10 spiking neurons and the pattern of their firing rate is used in the test phase to decode the auditory spatial attention of a given test sample. Moreover, the effects of using low connectivity rates of the layers and specific range of learning parameters of the learning rule are investigated. The proposed model achieves an average accuracy of 90% with only 10% of EEG signals as training data. This study also provides new insights into the role of sparse coding in both cortical networks subserving cognitive tasks and brain-inspired machine learning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据