4.7 Article

Trough concentration of voriconazole and its relationship with efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 71, 期 7, 页码 1772-1785

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw045

关键词

-

资金

  1. HOSPIRA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The optimum trough concentration of voriconazole for clinical response and safety is controversial. The objective of this review was to determine the optimum trough concentration of voriconazole and evaluate its relationship with efficacy and safety. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Library and three Chinese literature databases were searched. Observational studies that compared clinical outcomes below and above the trough concentration cut-off value were included. We set the trough concentration cut-off value for efficacy as 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 mg/L and for safety as 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 5.5 and 6.0 mg/L. The efficacy outcomes were invasive fungal infection-related mortality, all-cause mortality, rate of successful treatment and rate of prophylaxis failure. The safety outcomes included incidents of hepatotoxicity, neurotoxicity and visual disorders. Results: A total of 21 studies involving 1158 patients were included. Compared with voriconazole trough concentrations of >0.5 mg/L, levels of <0.5 mg/L significantly decreased the rate of treatment success (risk ratio = 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.74). The incidence of hepatotoxicity was significantly increased with trough concentrations >3.0, >4.0, >5.5 and >6.0 mg/L. The incidence of neurotoxicity was significantly increased with trough concentrations >.4.0 and >.5.5 mg/L. Conclusions: A voriconazole level of 0.5 mg/L should be considered the lower threshold associated with efficacy. A trough concentration >.3.0 mg/L is associated with increased hepatotoxicity, particularly for the Asian population, and >.4.0 mg/L is associated with increased neurotoxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据