4.4 Review

The role of inhibitory circuits in hippocampal memory processing

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 476-492

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41583-022-00599-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GABAergic inhibitory circuits play a crucial role in hippocampal functions, and specific types of interneurons contribute to network activity. Recent studies have shown that distinct interneuron types have unique mechanisms in influencing temporal binding, synaptic plasticity, and spatial information acquisition in hippocampal memory processes.
GABAergic inhibitory circuits play an essential role in coordinating various hippocampal functions. Several decades of work dedicated to a thorough characterization of hippocampal inhibitory populations have highlighted how specific types of interneuron can contribute to network activity. Recent studies have used genetically targeted recordings and peturbations of activity during memory-related behaviours to determine how interneurons that inhibit distinct subcellular domains of principal cells or specialize in principal cell disinhibition may sculpt hippocampal memory. These studies highlight unique contributions of distinct interneuron types to the temporal binding of hippocampal ensembles, synaptic plasticity and the acquisition of spatial and contextual information. Here, we review the current state of knowledge around hippocampal inhibition and memory by discussing the multifaceted roles of populations of inhibitory cells at different stages of hippocampal mnemonic processing. Hippocampal inhibitory interneurons shape memory formation and storage through cell type-specific mechanisms. In this review, Topolnik and Tamboli discuss how soma-targeting, dendrite-targeting and interneuron-targeting interneurons may specialize in supporting hippocampal oscillations, synaptic plasticity and memory processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据