4.7 Article

Chromobacterium spp. harbour Ambler class A β-lactamases showing high identity with KPC

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 71, 期 6, 页码 1493-1496

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw020

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [HEALTH-F3-2011-282004]
  2. University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. University of Fribourg, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The origin of KPC is unknown. The aim of this study was to detect progenitors of KPC in silico and to functionally verify their beta-lactam hydrolysis activity. Methods: The sequence of KPC-2 was used to mine the NCBI protein sequence database. The best non-KPC hits were analysed by amino acid (aa) alignment and phylogenetic tree construction. Genes encoding KPC-2 homologues were expressed in Escherichia coli. The carbapenemase activities of the recombinant strains were characterized by the CarbaNP test and UV spectrophotometry and MICs of selected beta-lactams were determined. Results: Genes encoding the closest KPC-2 homologues were identified on the chromosome of Chromobacterium piscinae strain ND17 (CRP-1, 76% aa identity), Chromobacterium sp. C-61 (CRS-1, 70% aa identity) and Chromobacterium haemolyticum DSM19808 (CRH-1, 69% aa identity). All three Chromobacterium beta-lactamases were phylogenetically more related to KPC than to other Ambler class A beta-lactamases. The 27 bp region preceding the start codon of bla(CRP-1) displayed high nucleotide identity to the corresponding region upstream from bla(KPC) (74%). Heterologous expression of bla(CRP-1) and to a lesser extent of bla(CRH-1) in E. coli significantly increased the MICs of meropenem and most cephalosporins. The CarbaNP test was positive for both recombinant strains, but spectrophotometric analysis confirmed higher carbapenemase activity for CRP-1-producing clones. Conclusions: The recovery of three class A beta-lactamases with up to 76% aa identity to KPC from distinct Chromobacterium species is highly indicative of the role played by this genus in the evolution of KPC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据