4.8 Article

Performance of plasma phosphorylated tau 181 and 217 in the community

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 1398-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01822-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U01 AG006786, R37 AG011378, R01 NS097495, P30 AG062677, RF1 AG069052, R01 AG041851]
  2. GHR Foundation
  3. NIH National Institute on Aging [R01 AG034676]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasma phosphorylated tau 181 (P-tau181) and 217 (P-tau217) can predict abnormal amyloid and tau pathology in community-based populations, but their predictive abilities vary across different brain regions, and are influenced by multiple comorbidities.
Plasma phosphorylated tau 181 (P-tau181) and 217 (P-tau217) are indicators of both amyloid and tau pathology in clinical settings, but their performance in heterogeneous community-based populations is unclear. We examined P-tau181 and P-tau217 (n = 1,329, aged 30-98 years), in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Continuous, unadjusted plasma P-tau181 and P-tau217 predicted abnormal amyloid positron-emission tomography (PET) (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) = 0.81-0.86) and tau PET entorhinal cortex (AUROC > 0.80), but was less predictive of a tau PET temporal region of interest (AUROC < 0.70). Multiple comorbidities were associated with higher plasma P-tau181 and P-tau217 levels; the difference between participants with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD) was similar to the difference between participants with and without elevated brain amyloid. The exclusion of participants with CKD and other comorbidities affected the establishment of a normal reference range and cutpoints. Understanding the effect of comorbidities on P-tau181 and P-tau217 levels is important for their future interpretation in the context of clinical screening, diagnosis or prognosis at the population level. Multiple comorbidities are associated with higher plasma P-tau181 and P-tau217 levels, and affects their normal reference ranges and cutpoints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据