4.8 Article

Development of a clinical polygenic risk score assay and reporting workflow

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 1006-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01767-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH National Human Genome Research Institute [R35HG010706]
  2. NIH [R01HL139731, R01HL157635, U01HG008685, R01HG010372, R01HL143295, OT2OD02750, U41HG006834, U01TR003201]
  3. American Heart Association [18SFRN34250007]
  4. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [R01HL142711, R01HL148050, R01HL151283, R01HL127564, R01HL148565, R01HL135242, R01HL151152]
  5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R01DK125782]
  6. Fondation Leducq [TNE-18CVD04]
  7. Massachusetts General Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first report from the GenoVA Study provides insights into the development of a clinical polygenic risk score assay and discusses the challenges of implementing and reporting the results. The study developed a clinical genotype array-based assay for multiple conditions and analyzed prospective samples to determine the frequency of high-risk polygenic risk scores. The research highlights the importance of developing resources and workflows for using polygenic risk score information in patient care.
The first report from the prospective GenoVA Study provides preliminary insights into the development of a polygenic risk score assay in a clinical setting and discusses the challenges of generating, interpreting and reporting results. Implementation of polygenic risk scores (PRS) may improve disease prevention and management but poses several challenges: the construction of clinically valid assays, interpretation for individual patients, and the development of clinical workflows and resources to support their use in patient care. For the ongoing Veterans Affairs Genomic Medicine at Veterans Affairs (GenoVA) Study we developed a clinical genotype array-based assay for six published PRS. We used data from 36,423 Mass General Brigham Biobank participants and adjustment for population structure to replicate known PRS-disease associations and published PRS thresholds for a disease odds ratio (OR) of 2 (ranging from 1.75 (95% CI: 1.57-1.95) for type 2 diabetes to 2.38 (95% CI: 2.07-2.73) for breast cancer). After confirming the high performance and robustness of the pipeline for use as a clinical assay for individual patients, we analyzed the first 227 prospective samples from the GenoVA Study and found that the frequency of PRS corresponding to published OR > 2 ranged from 13/227 (5.7%) for colorectal cancer to 23/150 (15.3%) for prostate cancer. In addition to the PRS laboratory report, we developed physician- and patient-oriented informational materials to support decision-making about PRS results. Our work illustrates the generalizable development of a clinical PRS assay for multiple conditions and the technical, reporting and clinical workflow challenges for implementing PRS information in the clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据