4.7 Article

CD66b-CD64dimCD115- cells in the human bone marrow represent neutrophil-committed progenitors

期刊

NATURE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 679-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41590-022-01189-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. AIRC [IG-20339]
  2. MIUR-PRIN grant [20177J4E75_004]
  3. Fondazione Cariverona
  4. [GR-2016-02361263]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cassatella and colleagues have identified the earliest neutrophil-committed progenitor cells in the human bone marrow. These cells share similar characteristics with mature neutrophil subsets expressing interferon-stimulated genes in diseased individuals. This discovery sheds light on the early stages of neutrophil development and is of significant importance.
Cassatella and colleagues identify CD66b(-)CD64(dim)CD115(-) cells in the human bone marrow as the earliest neutrophil-committed progenitor cells described to date. Here we report the identification of human CD66b(-)CD64(dim)CD115(-) neutrophil-committed progenitor cells (NCPs) within the SSC(lo)CD45(dim)CD34(+) and CD34(dim/-) subsets in the bone marrow. NCPs were either CD45RA(+) or CD45RA(-), and in vitro experiments showed that CD45RA acquisition was not mandatory for their maturation process. NCPs exclusively generated human CD66b(+) neutrophils in both in vitro differentiation and in vivo adoptive transfer experiments. Single-cell RNA-sequencing analysis indicated NCPs fell into four clusters, characterized by different maturation stages and distributed along two differentiation routes. One of the clusters was characterized by an interferon-stimulated gene signature, consistent with the reported expansion of peripheral mature neutrophil subsets that express interferon-stimulated genes in diseased individuals. Finally, comparison of transcriptomic and phenotypic profiles indicated NCPs represented earlier neutrophil precursors than the previously described early neutrophil progenitors (eNePs), proNeus and COVID-19 proNeus. Altogether, our data shed light on the very early phases of neutrophil ontogeny.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据