4.8 Article

Fludarabine increases nuclease-free AAV- and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination in mice

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 1285-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-022-01240-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [2R01HL06427418A1, DK098132]
  2. Falk Medical Research Trust
  3. National Hemophilia Foundation
  4. Stanford Beckman Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors can substantially enhance the efficiency of adeno-associated virus-mediated homologous recombination-based gene therapy. These findings suggest that clinically approved inhibitors, such as fludarabine, can be used to potentiate gene editing therapies.
Homologous recombination (HR)-based gene therapy using adeno-associated viruses (AAV-HR) without nucleases has several advantages over classic gene therapy, especially the potential for permanent transgene expression. However, the low efficiency of AAV-HR remains a major limitation. Here, we tested a series of small-molecule compounds and found that ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) inhibitors substantially enhance AAV-HR efficiency in mouse and human liver cell lines approximately threefold. Short-term administration of the RNR inhibitor fludarabine increased the in vivo efficiency of both non-nuclease- and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated AAV-HR two- to sevenfold in the murine liver, without causing overt toxicity. Fludarabine administration induced transient DNA damage signaling in both proliferating and quiescent hepatocytes. Notably, the majority of AAV-HR events occurred in non-proliferating hepatocytes in both fludarabine-treated and control mice, suggesting that the induction of transient DNA repair signaling in non-dividing hepatocytes was responsible for enhancing AAV-HR efficiency in mice. These results suggest that use of a clinically approved RNR inhibitor can potentiate AAV-HR-based genome-editing therapeutics. Fludarabine-induced DNA damage pathways enhance the in vivo efficiency of homologous recombination-based gene editing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据