4.8 Article

Single electrons on solid neon as a solid-state qubit platform

期刊

NATURE
卷 605, 期 7908, 页码 46-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04539-x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an experimental realization of a qubit platform based on isolated single electrons trapped on an ultraclean solid neon surface. By integrating an electron trap in a circuit quantum electrodynamics architecture, strong coupling between a single electron and a single microwave photon is achieved. The results indicate that the electron-on-solid-neon qubit performs near the state of the art for a charge qubit.
yProgress towards the realization of quantum computers requires persistent advances in their constituent building blocks-qubits. Novel qubit platforms that simultaneously embody long coherence, fast operation and large scalability offer compelling advantages in the construction of quantum computers and many other quantum information systems(1-3). Electrons, ubiquitous elementary particles of non-zero charge, spin and mass, have commonly been perceived as paradigmatic local quantum information carriers. Despite superior controllability and configurability, their practical performance as qubits through either motional or spin states depends critically on their material environment(3-5). Here we report our experimental realization of a qubit platform based on isolated single electrons trapped on an ultraclean solid neon surface in vacuum(6-13). By integrating an electron trap in a circuit quantum electrodynamics architecture(14-20), we achieve strong coupling between the motional states of a single electron and a single microwave photon in an on-chip superconducting resonator. Qubit gate operations and dispersive readout are implemented to measure the energy relaxation time T-1 of 15 mu s and phase coherence time T-2 over 200 ns. These results indicate that the electron-on-solid-neon qubit already performs near the state of the art for a charge qubit(21).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据