Engineered jumpers overcome biological limits via work multiplication

For centuries, scientists have explored the limits of biological jump height(1,2), and for decades, engineers have designed jumping machines(3-18) that often mimicked or took inspiration from biological jumpers. Despite these efforts, general analyses are missing that compare the energetics of biological and engineered jumpers across scale. Here we show how biological and engineered jumpers have key differences in their jump energetics. The jump height of a biological jumper is limited by the work its linear motor (muscle) can produce in a single stroke. By contrast, the jump height of an engineered device can be far greater because its ratcheted or rotary motor can 'multiply work' during repeated strokes or rotations. As a consequence of these differences in energy production, biological and engineered jumpers should have divergent designs for maximizing jump height. Following these insights, we created a device that can jump over 30 metres high, to our knowledge far higher than previous engineered jumpers and over an order of magnitude higher than the best biological jumpers. Our work advances the understanding of jumping, shows a new level of performance, and underscores the importance of considering the differences between engineered and biological systems.

Automated summary

There are key differences in jump energetics between biological and engineered jumpers, with the jump height of engineered devices being able to exceed that of biological jumpers significantly. The authors have created a jumping device that can reach over 30 meters high, a significant advancement in jump height compared to previous engineering and biological systems.