4.6 Article

Identification of droughts over Saudi Arabia and global teleconnections

期刊

NATURAL HAZARDS
卷 112, 期 3, 页码 2717-2737

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05285-z

关键词

Drought indices; Consensus; Effective rainfall; Historical drought; KSA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzes drought conditions in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and their relationship with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. It provides an overview for drought managers and disaster agencies to develop contingency plans for climate-smart agriculture and water management in the region.
Drought is known as one of the most devastating climate extremes, which the world is facing in recent decades. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) lies in the water-stressed region, with high rainfall inter-annual variability, and is highly vulnerable to recurring droughts. In this study, six different drought indices, i.e., Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI), Deciles Index, Percentage Departure and two relatively new drought indices (aSPI and eRDI), based on effective rainfall are calculated, to determine the consensus drought years between 1985 and 2020. Based on these indices eight drought years (1990, 2003, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012 and 2017) are identified, with 2007 as the extreme drought year, and the longest episode of drought (moderate to extreme intensity) was experienced during 2007-2012 (except 2010) over the region, where almost 70% of the KSA total area was under drought. Empirical Orthogonal Function analysis is performed on the SPI drought index for studying the inter-annual variability of drought over KSA. A robust relationship is found between droughts and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), indicating some predictability of droughts over KSA. This study provides an overview for drought managers and disasters agencies to develop a contingency plan for climate-smart agriculture and water management toward sustainable development over the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据