4.6 Article

Competing magnetic states and M-H loop splitting in core-shell NiO nanoparticles

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 33, 期 34, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ac6dc3

关键词

magnetic interactions; core-shell nanoparticles; neutron diffraction

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan
  2. Australian Research Council [DP160100545]
  3. AINSE ECRG 2019 grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the competing magnetic states between superparamagnetic blocking and Neel transition states in 14 nm core-shell NiO nanoparticles. An interesting M-H loop splitting attributed to slow spin relaxation was observed at a crossover temperature, which is particle size dependent and suppressed for diameters above and below 14 nm.
Magnetic relaxation in a nanoparticles system depends on the intra-particle interactions, reversal mechanism, the anisotropy field, easy axis distribution, particle volume, lattice defects, surface defects, materials composite, etc. Here we report the competing magnetic states between superparamagnetic blocking and Neel transition states in 14 nm core-shell NiO nanoparticles. A crossover temperature of 50 K was observed for both these states from the zero field cooled/field cooled magnetization curves taken at different fields. At crossover temperature, an interesting M-H loop splitting is observed which is attributed to the slow spin relaxation. This anomalous M-H loop splitting behaviour was found to be particle size dependent and suppressed for diameters above and below 14 nm which indicates a critical size for these competing magnetic states. Additional neutron diffraction experiments confirmed this observation. This experimental study provides a new insight for the understanding of intra-particle interactions in fine antiferromagnetic nanoparticles and obtained results are an important step towards deeper understanding of the competing/non-competing modes between superparamagnetic blocked and Neel transition states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据