4.6 Article

Co-deposition of MoS2 films by reactive sputtering and formation of tree-like structures

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 33, 期 34, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ac70e3

关键词

transition metal dichalcogenides; MoS2; reactive sputtering; sulfur partial pressure

资金

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)
  2. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Japan [20002015-0]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the growth mechanism of MoS2 films co-deposited by using a sulfur hot-lip cell and a molybdenum sputtering target via reactive sputtering was investigated. It was found that the growth is dominated by vertically-oriented sheets with horizontal branches, resulting in a tree-like structure. The anisotropic incorporation of adatoms with regards to the orientation of MoS2 is responsible for the growth front of the structures.
Transition metal dichalcogenides are versatile layered materials with potential applications ranging from optoelectronic devices to water splitting. Top-down fabrication methods such as exfoliation are not practical for a large-scale production of high-quality devices: a bottom-up approach such as sputtering, a low-temperature deposition method, is more suitable. However, due to its anisotropic nature, the growth mechanism of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) via sputtering is complex and remains to be investigated in detail. In this paper, we study the growth of MoS2 films co-deposited by using a sulfur (S) hot-lip cell and a molybdenum (Mo) sputtering target via reactive sputtering. The impact of S partial pressure on the structure and morphology of MoS2 films was systematically characterized, and it was observed that the growth is dominated by vertically-oriented sheets with horizontal branches, resulting in a tree-like structure. The growth front of the structures is ascribed to the anisotropic incorporation of adatoms with regards to the orientation of MoS2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据