4.8 Article

Controlling exciton-exciton annihilation in WSe2 bilayers via interlayer twist

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 4661-4667

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4087-y

关键词

two-dimensional bilayer; twist angle; transient absorption; exciton-exciton annihilation; interlayer coupling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22022305, 21773208, 21922305, 21873080]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020XZZX002-06]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0207700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that the exciton-exciton annihilation process in TMD materials can be controlled by adjusting the twist angle, which is of great significance for optoelectronic applications.
The twist angle between two van der Waals coupled monolayers has emerged as a new and powerful degree of freedom for engineering physical properties of semiconductor homo- and hetero-bilayers. While the interlayer twist has shown prominent effect on electronic and optical properties of transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) bilayers, it remains unclear how it could be used to manipulate the exciton dynamics, especially exciton-exciton annihilation (EEA) process which is the dominant energy loss channel in TMDs under moderate to high exciton density due to strong Coulomb interaction. Herein, we show that the twist angle in TMD bilayers can act as an effective knob to control the EEA process. Specifically, EEA rate constant increases from 1 degrees twisted WSe2 bilayers (0.026 cm(2)/s) by more than twice to 32 degrees twisted bilayers (0.053 cm(2)/s) and then drops again in 60 degrees twisted bilayers (0.019 cm(2)/s). This twist-angle dependence can be attributed to the energy difference between indirect and direct excitons arising from the interlayer interaction. Our work opens up the possibility of artificially managing the exciton dynamics in TMD materials for optoelectronic applications via interlayer twist angle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据