4.8 Article

Bulky nanodiamond-confined synthesis of sub-5 nanometer ordered intermetallic Pd3Pb catalysts

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 6, 页码 4973-4979

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4138-4

关键词

Pd3Pb intermetallic compound; bulky nanodiamond; strong metal-support interaction; alkynes semihydrogenation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0702001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22071225]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2060190103]
  4. Joint Funds from Hefei National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory [KY2060000175]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis of small-sized Pd3Pb intermetallic nanocatalysts with improved catalytic performance is achieved by using a bulky nanodiamond-confined method. The resulting catalyst exhibits high activity and selectivity under mild conditions.
Modulation of geometric and electronic structures of supported Pd-based catalysts by forming atomically ordered intermetallic phases enables an effective way to optimize catalytic performance. However, the synthesis of small-sized Pd-based intermetallic nanoparticle catalysts with improved mass-based activity remains formidable challenges, since high-temperature annealing generally required for atom ordering inevitably leads to severe metal sintering and thus large crystallites. Here, we present a bulky nanodiamond-confined method to prepare sub-5 nm Pd3Pb intermetallic nanocatalysts by mitigating metal sintering at high temperatures, which is induced by the electronic interactions between metal and defect-rich graphene shells reinforced by diamond cores in the bulky nanodiamond support. The prepared small-sized Pd3Pb intermetallic catalyst displays a high activity with a turnover frequency of 932 h(-1) for the semihydrogenation of phenylacetylene under mild conditions (room temperature, 3 bar H-2), along with a high selectivity of > 96% to styrene near the complete conversion of phenylacetylene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据