4.8 Article

Stacking-Dependent Electrical Transport in a Colloidal CdSe Nanoplatelet Thin-Film Transistor

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 2780-2785

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04822

关键词

Thin-film transistor; CdSe nanoplatelets; mobility; Self-assembly; Charge transport

资金

  1. FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020 Program
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007688, UID/CTM/50025]
  3. ERC [787410]
  4. project SYNERGY H2020-WIDESPREAD2020-5, CSA [952169]
  5. project EMERGE H2020 EXCELLENT SCIENCE [101008701]
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [787410] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An exceptional feature of one-dimensional threadlike assemblies of a four-monolayer colloidal CdSe nanoplatelet-based thin-film transistor is reported. The study shows that the length of the threads affects the mobility, with the film containing the longest threads exhibiting the highest conductivity and electron mobility. The mobility trends are driven by the lower defects in the longer threads, resulting in less loss of electron hopping.
Here, we report an exceptional feature of the onedimensional threadlike assemblies of a four-monolayer colloidal CdSe nanoplatelet (NPL)-based thin-film transistor. A series of different lengths of threads (200-1200 nm) was used as an active n channel in thin-film transistors (TFTs) to understand the change in mobility with the length of the threads. The film with the longest threads shows the highest conductivity of similar to 12 S/cm and electron mobility of similar to 14.3 cm(2) V-1 s(-1) for an applied gate voltage of 2 V. The mobility trends with the length seem to be driven mostly by the lower defects in threads, where the loss of electron hopping is less. Furthermore, our results show the mobility trends in stacking-dependent CdSe NPL threads and provide a new insight into fabricating high-mobility TFTs with the use of colloidal CdSe NPLs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据