4.8 Article

Control of Structural Hydrophobicity and Cation Solvation on Interlayer Water Transport during Clay Dehydration

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 2740-2747

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04609

关键词

chemomechanical coupling e ff ect; nuclear waste repositories; evaporation; phyllosilicates; water transport

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003525]
  2. DOE Spent Fuel and Waste Science & Technology (SFWST) Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Swelling clay hydration/dehydration processes are significant in environmental and industrial applications. Experimental studies lack the ability to capture rapid water transport and structural changes in interlayers. Using molecular simulations and thermogravimetric analyses, researchers have observed a two-stage dehydration process in swelling clay, which is closely associated with interlayer collapse and changes in the coordination number of cations.
Swelling clay hydration/dehydration is important to many environmental and industrial processes. Experimental studies usually probe equilibrium hydration states in an averaged manner and thus cannot capture the fast water transport and structural change in interlayers during hydration/dehydration. Using molecular simulations and thermogravimetric analyses, we observe a two-stage dehydration process. The first stage is controlled by evaporation at the edges: water molecules near hydrophobic sites and the first few water molecules of the hydration shell of cations move fast to particle edges for evaporation. The second stage is controlled by slow desorption of the last 1-2 water molecules from the cations and slow transport through the interlayers. The two-stage dehydration is strongly coupled with interlayer collapse and the coordination number changes of cations, all of which depend on layer charge distribution. This mechanistic interpretation of clay dehydration can be key to the coupled chemomechanical behavior in natural/engineered barriers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据