4.8 Article

Thermal Control of Plasmonic Surface Lattice Resonances

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 3879-3883

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04898

关键词

metamaterials; plasmonics; surface lattice resonance

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [322002]
  2. Flagship of Photonics Research and Innovation (PREIN) - Academy of Finland [320165, 320166]
  3. Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [322002, 322002] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By breaking the symmetry of the nanoparticle surroundings, the properties of high quality factor SLRs can be easily modified. We demonstrated how changing the refractive index of the surrounding immersion oil by controlling the ambient temperature of the device can increase the quality factor of the SLR. These results show accurate and reversible modification of SLR properties, opening up possibilities for tunable SLR-based photonic devices.
Plasmonic metasurfaces exhibiting collective re-sponses known as surface lattice resonances (SLRs) show potentialfor realizingflat photonic components for wavelength-selectiveprocesses, including lasing and optical nonlinearities. However,postfabrication tuning of SLRs remains challenging, limiting theapplicability of SLR-based components. Here, we demonstrate howthe properties of high quality factor SLRs are easily modified bybreaking the symmetry of the nanoparticle surroundings. We breakthe symmetry by changing the refractive index of the overlyingimmersion oil by controlling the ambient temperature of thedevice. We show that a modest temperature change of 10 degrees C canincrease the quality factor of the SLR from 400 to 750. Our results demonstrate accurate and reversible modification of theproperties of the investigated SLRs, paving the way toward tunable SLR-based photonic devices. More generally, we show howsymmetry breaking of the environment can be utilized for efficient and potentially ultrafast modification of the SLR properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据