4.6 Article

Prediction of epileptic seizures from spectral features of intracranial eeg recordings using deep learning approach

期刊

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
卷 81, 期 20, 页码 28875-28898

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-12611-x

关键词

Deep learning; Epilepsy; Healthcare; Internet of things; Intracranial EEG; Cloud computing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a deep learning framework is proposed for the prediction of epileptic seizures using intracranial EEG recordings. The framework performs signal filtering and segmentation, and extracts features from each segment to achieve accurate and real-time prediction of epileptic seizures.
Epilepsy is a prevalent neurological disorder, which disturbs the lives of millions of people worldwide owing to the onset of abrupt seizures. The forecasting of seizures could help in protecting their lives by alerts or in clinical operations during epilepsy surgeries. The present paper addresses this problem by proposing a deep learning framework for prediction of epileptic seizures using intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings. This framework performs filtering and segmentation of iEEG signals into 10s, 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s and 60s duration segments. These segments are further resolved into eight distinct spectral bands corresponding to delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma sub-bands with frequency-domain transformation. Then, mean amplitude and band power features are extracted from each band, which are provided to convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory network (LSTM) algorithms for classification. The simulation results of the proposed CNN model exhibit higher performance with average accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC and F1 score of 94.74%, 95.8%, 94.46%, 95.13% and 94.75% respectively for iEEG segments of 40s duration. Thus, the performance analysis and comparison with existing literature unveil that the proposed CNN model is an optimal approach for accurate and real-time prediction of epileptic seizures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据