4.7 Article

Fundamental differences in the properties of red and blue quasars: measuring the reddening and accretion properties with X-shooter

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac945

关键词

accretion, accretion discs; galaxies: active; galaxies: evolution; quasars: emission lines; quasars: general

资金

  1. European Southern Observatory [0101.B-0739(A), 088.B-1034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have found fundamental differences in the radio properties of red quasars when compared to typical blue quasars. Dust reddening can fully explain the observed colours for the majority of the red quasars, and there are no significant differences in the accretion properties between red and blue quasars. The radio emission is more closely connected to circumnuclear/ISM opacity.
We have recently found fundamental differences in the radio properties of red quasars when compared to typical blue quasars. In this paper, we use data from the X-shooter spectrograph on the Very Large Telescope, providing spectral coverage from similar to 3000-25 000 angstrom, of a sample of 40 red and blue luminous quasars at 1.45 < z < 1.65 to explore the connections between the radio, emission-line, and accretion-disc properties. We fit various dust-extinction curves to the data and find that dust reddening can fully explain the observed colours for the majority of the red quasars in our sample, with moderate extinctions ranging from A(V) similar to 0.06-0.7 mag. We confront our spectra with a simple thin accretion-disc model and find this can describe the continua of both the blue and red quasars, once corrected for dust extinction; we also find no significant differences in the accretion properties. We detect ionized outflows in a number of red and blue quasars, but do not find any significant evidence that they are more prevalent in the red quasar population. Overall our findings imply that the radio emission is more closely connected to circumnuclear/ISM opacity rather than accretion disc or outflow differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据