4.7 Article

Empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac628

关键词

planets and satellites: composition; planets and satellites: individual: Neptune; planets and satellites: individual: Uranus; planets and satellites: interiors

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [200020 188460]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune and predicts their rotation periods and wind depths by using higher order gravitational coefficients. The study finds that faster rotation and deep winds favor centrally concentrated density distributions. Accurate measurements of the gravity field and moment of inertia can constrain their internal structures and wind depths.
Uranus and Neptune are still poorly understood. Their gravitational fields, rotation periods, atmosphere dynamics, and internal structures are not well determined. In this paper, we present empirical structure models of Uranus and Neptune where the density profiles are represented by polytropes. By using these models that are set to fit the planetary gravity field, we predict the higher order gravitational coefficients J(6) and J(8) for various assumed rotation periods, wind depths, and uncertainty of the low-order harmonics. We show that faster rotation and/or deep winds favour centrally concentrated density distributions. We demonstrate that an accurate determination of J(6) or J(8) with a relative uncertainty no larger than 10 per cent could constrain wind depths of Uranus and Neptune. We also confirm that the Voyager II rotation periods are inconsistent with the measured shapes of Uranus and Neptune. We next demonstrate that more accurate determination of the gravity field can significantly reduce the possible range of internal structures. Finally, we suggest that an accurate measurement of the moment of inertia of Uranus and Neptune with a relative uncertainty of similar to 1 per cent and similar to 0.1 per cent, could constrain their rotation periods and depths of the winds, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据