4.7 Article

Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Data Release 4 and the z < 0.1 total and z < 0.08 morphological galaxy stellar mass functions

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac472

关键词

catalogues; surveys; galaxies: distances and redshift; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: luminosity function, mass function; cosmological parameters

资金

  1. University of St Andrews
  2. International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research
  3. European Southern Observatory
  4. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council
  5. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [621.016.402]
  6. European Research Council Consolidator Grant [770935]
  7. European Research Council [770935]
  8. Max Planck Society
  9. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  10. Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  11. Heisenberg grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Hi 1495/5-1]
  12. European Research Council through ERC Advanced Investigator grant [GA 786910]
  13. H2020 ERC [683184]
  14. ERC [695671]
  15. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  16. Polish National Science Center [2020/38/E/ST9/00395, 2018/30/E/ST9/00698, 2018/31/G/ST9/03388]
  17. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [DIR/WK/2018/12]
  18. Australian Government through the Australian Research Council's Laureate Fellowship [FL180100168]
  19. BIS National E-infrastructure capital grants [ST/P002293/1, ST/R002371/1, ST/S002502/1, ST/R000832/1]
  20. STFC (UK)
  21. ARC (Australia)
  22. AAO
  23. ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory under programme [177.A-3016, 177, A3017, 177.A-3018, 179.A-2004]
  24. Pawsey Supercomputing Centre
  25. Australian Government
  26. Government of Western Australia
  27. DUG Technology
  28. Australian Research Council [FL180100168] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the Galaxy And Mass Assembly Data Release 4 (GAMA DR4), a full spectroscopic redshift sample is provided, which includes 248,682 galaxy spectra and a total of 330,542 redshifts. This data set has the highest redshift density and high completeness, making it suitable for studying galaxy mergers, galaxy groups, and low redshift galaxy population. The release also includes additional measured and derived data products. The analysis of the data reveals the total galaxy stellar mass function and its subdivision by morphological class.
In Galaxy And Mass Assembly Data Release 4 (GAMA DR4), we make available our full spectroscopic redshift sample. This includes 248 682 galaxy spectra, and, in combination with earlier surveys, results in 330 542 redshifts across five sky regions covering similar to 250 deg(2). The redshift density, is the highest available over such a sustained area, has exceptionally high completeness (95 per cent to r(KiDS) = 19.65 mag), and is well-suited for the study of galaxy mergers, galaxy groups, and the low redshift (z < 0.25) galaxy population. DR4 includes 32 value-added tables or Data Management Units (DMUs) that provide a number of measured and derived data products including GALEX, ESO KiDS, ESO VIKING, WISE, and HerschelSpace Observatory imaging. Within this release, we provide visual morphologies for 15 330 galaxies to z < 0.08, photometric redshift estimates for all 18 million objects to r(KiDS) similar to 25 mag, and stellar velocity dispersions for 111 830 galaxies. We conclude by deriving the total galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) and its sub-division by morphological class (elliptical, compact-bulge and disc, diffuse-bulge and disc, and disc only). This extends our previous measurement of the total GSMF down to 10(6.75) M-circle dot h(70)(-2) and we find a total stellar mass density of rho(*) = (2.97 +/- 0.04) x 10(8) M-circle dot h(70) Mpc(-3) or Omega(*)=(2.17 +/- 0.03) x 10(-3) h(70)(-1). We conclude that at z < 0.1, the Universe has converted 4.9 +/- 0.1 per cent of the baryonic mass implied by big bang Nucleosynthesis into stars that are gravitationally bound within the galaxy population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据